Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 3481 - 3500 of 4,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2008, 3:24 am
It is a case of a coach imposing a new offense on a team for which he does (yet) not have the right personnel. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[15]  The Commission also said that “the fact that a registrant is exposed to a material transition risk does not necessarily result in its … emissions being de facto material to the registrant. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
DeGennaro, No. 06-4195 Order holding that retrial of defendants would not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause and denying motions to bar retrial and dismiss the indictment is reversed where: 1) the decision of the trial court that there was "manifest necessity" to declare a mistrial was an abuse of discretion; and 2) a statement by counsel in support of a motion for mistrial, quickly reconsidered, does not preclude the defendant from claiming that the Double Jeopardy… [read post]
14 Nov 2005, 4:58 pm
This is high praise indeed.What does the Study mean in practical terms for matters of international humanitarian law? [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Thus, the court couldn’t determine whether secondary meaning existed in these elements, or the logo, or the logo plus the six elements.While “intentional copying constitutes persuasive evidence of consumer recognition, conscious replication alone does not establish secondary meaning. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Carrie Goldberg
Editor’s note: This piece is in part a modified excerpt from the author's book, “Nobody’s Victim: Fighting Psychos, Stalkers, Pervs, and Trolls,” available from Penguin Random House on August 13, 2019. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
         Section 4(f) provides that the Secretary of Transportation may approve a transportation project "requiring the use of . . . land of an historic site . . . only if: (1) there is no prudent and feasible alternative to using that land; and (2) the . . . project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the . . . historic site . . . . [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:03 am by Patricia Hughes
(SCJ, para. 1) Justice Leroy explained that for a successful appeal, the Crown must show that the trial judge erred in law and that “had the errors not occurred, there would not necessarily have been an acquittal” (SCJ, para. 2). [read post]