Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 3481 - 3500 of 7,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2015, 4:56 am by Andres
Behold the case of British Academy of Songwriters, Composers And Authors & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation And Skills [2015] EWHC 1723 (BASCA v BIS for short). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:54 am by Joy Waltemath
In addition, the EEOC opposed fees for attorney travel time by arguing that the defense could have retained local counsel, yet the agency used counsel from out of state. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The Court's ruling states that the civil rights act does not require employers to be neutral but rather, that they provide an applicant's or employee's religious practices "favored treatment. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 11:33 am by Steve Vladeck
Plain English: A federal court entertaining a claim for post-conviction relief from a prisoner convicted in state court may only rule for the prisoner if he can show that a state court ruling that a trial court’s error did not affect the result of the proceedings was itself so deeply inconsistent with established precedent such that no fair-minded jurist could agree. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:04 am by Karel Frielink
Press release In today’s Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Delfi AS v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
English Courts and the ‘Internalisation’ of the European Convention of Human Rights? [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
”The difficulty here is that many states, having refused to legislate in favour of text and data-mining, are presumably not convinced of their merit. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:28 am
In the five years after the Court invalidated the Gun-Free School Zones Act for exceeding the scope of the federal Commerce Power in United States v. [read post]