Search for: "English v. English" Results 3481 - 3500 of 11,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It will also consider whether the December 2014 decision was itself a reorganisation measure which required recognition by the English courts. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The NT2 case was the first “delisting order” made by an English court and was, perhaps understandably, the focus of most of the media reporting (for example, the BBC and the Guardian). [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 7:40 pm
Party Constitution CPPCC Constitution State Constitution 1945 Amendment VI 1949 Common Program 1954 Amendment I Constitution Promulgated 1956 Amendment VII 1969 Amendment VIII 1973 Amendment IX 1975 Amendment I 1977 Amendment X 1978 Amendment II Amendment II 1982 Amendment XI Amendment III Amendment III 1987 Amendment XII 1988 Amendment IV 1992 Amendment XIII 1993 Amendment V 1994 Amendment IV 1997 Amendment XIV … [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Dan Ernst
English common law embodied in the original Constitution confers birthright citizenship and permits self-government there. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am by Louise Pearce
To establish the English court’s jurisdiction, the bank had to show it had a good arguable case in the tort of conspiracy to injure by unlawful means against Mr Khrapunov. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:57 am
Questions in the Tom Kabinet CJEU reference finalized (at last) and brought to us by Kat Eleonora.PatentsThe AmeriKat reports that the Court of Appeal, following EPO, reverses Carr J in Regeneron v Kymab dispute and also providing a summary of English law in sufficiency. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 7:30 am by William Ford
Scott Harman summarized the proceedings in Doe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:04 am by Mclarty Wolf
In a dispute whether the will-maker was mentally capable of making a will, the Court will apply a common law legal test known as the rule in Banks v Goodfellow (which is a nineteenth century English court decision). [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:50 am by Thomas Surmanski
 A similar issue was explored by the Supreme Court in R. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 3:42 am by Brian Cordery
Interestingly, in light of the Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Lilly having been handed down after the first instance judgment in the present proceedings, Regeneron appears to have argued that even if Kymab was right on construction, there was still infringement under the newly-conceived English law doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:02 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
In A v B, the English court held that a single notice to arbitrate under several arbitration agreements was invalid and the arbitrator had no authority to decide disputes under several arbitration agreements. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm by clc-admin
In A v B, the English court held that a single notice to arbitrate under several arbitration agreements was invalid and the arbitrator had no authority to decide disputes under several arbitration agreements. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 2:00 pm
” He continued: “One can only contemplate with dread the answer the current Court would have given had it been asked to overrule Plessy v. [read post]