Search for: "Ex parte Long" Results 3481 - 3500 of 5,734
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2013, 3:55 pm by familoo
And every brief arrives in the nick of time (if by “nick of time” you mean in sufficient time to allow all the papers to be read without making allowance for cooking dinner, sleep, or generally doing anything between the hours of 7.30am and bed other than work)…Oh how I long for those slender ex parte non mol briefs of my youth. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Though the form includes a check-box for appeal fee payment, the form itself states that this check is to be performed only in ex parte cases (where interlocutory revision by the Examining Division under A 109 is possible […]). [read post]
8 May 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  Would the deponent need an especially long mid-afternoon break? [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
And lest there be any doubt on the subject, the Supreme Court has long understood this very point… As Chief Justice Roberts explained for the Court two years ago in Stern v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Here are the various components of what Slate has published: INTRODUCTION PART ONE: ENDLESS INTERROGATIONS PART TWO: DISAPPEARED PART THREE: FAMILY SLAHI’S TIMELINE AN INTERVIEW WITH COL. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is an appeal against the revocation of the opposed patent. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:38 am by Leslie Sammis
 If the ex parte (temporary) injunction is granted: Any such temporary injunction shall be effective for a fixed period not to exceed 15 days. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:59 am by Veronika Gaertner
However, it demonstrates that even codified rules in IP-Law leave substantial insecurities with regard to international harmony as long as IP-laws have territorial reach only. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm by Florian Mueller
This second part is not nearly as unique as the first one.Going beyond these two fundamental points, the decision outlines several "basic principles" in paragraphs 70-74:"A [F]RAND royalty should be set at a level consistent with the SSOs' [standard-setting organizations'] goal of promoting widespread adoption of their standards."" [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:51 am by Nathan Dorn
  In a long and defiant interview, he claimed that the Ex officio oath was illegal and that he could not understand how he could be bound to answer questions unrelated to his imprisonment. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:30 am by Venkat
Second, the court says that this is part of an overall scheme that the plaintiffs were disciplined for. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 5:15 am by Charles Sartain
An End to Ex Parte Communications • Instruct the commission to develop a policy prohibiting ex parte communication between hearings examiners and commissioners, or between hearings examiners and technical staff of the commission who has participated in a hearing, including prohibiting a commissioner from communicating with a hearings examiner other than in a formal public hearing. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:07 am by Gregory McNeal
Some observers are looking to short term gains from a killing while others look to the long term consequences of the targeted killing policy. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Here is a recent decision on a petition for review. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:00 pm by SJM
We are all aware that there is no general entitlement to permanent accommodation via the Part VII route (R v Brent ex p Awua). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:00 pm by SJM
We are all aware that there is no general entitlement to permanent accommodation via the Part VII route (R v Brent ex p Awua). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 8:25 am by Jackie Hutter, IP Strategist
Sometimes (but not as often as people think), patents are the strong way for the innovator to capture value in the long term. [read post]