Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 3481 - 3500 of 30,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2007, 1:08 pm by Pamela Fasick
The Intent Use of Protected Speech or Activity As Evidence Does Not Mean that a Cause of Action is a SLAPP Cause of ActionDepartment of Fair Employment & Housing v. 1105 Alta Loma Road Apartments, LLC (Sept. 5, 2007, B194891, Second District)18 p. opinionAn action is a SLAPP action only if it is based on the defendant's protected free speech or petitioning activity. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 7:47 pm
The first bill that President Obama has signed while in office was the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, signed on Thursday, January 29th, and which overturns the 2007 US Supreme Court decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:22 am
Yesterday, in the case of Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm by admin
Council Focuses on New Online Gaming LawPrivate Lawyers on Contract to Represent States: Is That Fair? [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
The Barclay Brothers successfully argued that the dual role of the office of Seneschal, as President of the Chief of Pleas and chief judge, meant that the 2008 Law was incompatible with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”) (the right to a fair trial). [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:19 am by Chijioke Okorie
For example, it was suggested that for the quotation exception in section 12B(1)(a) of the CAB, the “fair practice” standard should be explicitly stated so that the quotation exception will only apply inter alia where the quotation “is compatible with fair practice”. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm by Florian Mueller
The calendar of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit still states that each side will get 10 minutes in the third criminal case; maybe another judge will fill in or they have some other solution.Presumably the three judges to whom the case was assigned--and their clerks--have already spent a fair amount of time analyzing the case, and hopefully they will remain in charge.For a civil law case, Epic Games v. [read post]