Search for: "Franks v. Franks"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 6,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2016, 5:30 am
It’s taken from Katz v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 1:41 pm
The defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly denied his motion to dismiss filed pursuant to Franks v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
In such situations the attorney isdeemed the individual's agent [see Bianca v Frank, 43 NY2d 168].The Appellate Division said that Section 7506(d) of the CPLR specifically provides that where a party in an arbitration is represented by an attorney, papers to be served on a party are to be served on the attorney.In contrast, the court held that there was no similar statutory requirement when a party elects to be represented by a union representative who is not an attorney.The… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
Releasing its ruling in R. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 3:30 pm
A. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:13 am
Hinkle clarified his ruling in Brenner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:36 am
Supreme Court decision, Atherton v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
Although much of the case law referred to (including Buscarini & Ors v San Marino (1999) 30 EHRR 208) concerned the freedom not to hold religious rather than political beliefs, the principles expressed in those cases applied in this instance. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:47 am
In Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
Gallagher authored the opinion and Judge Frank D. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm
Lindsay, Overview of State RPM, ANTITRUST MAGAZINE (Fall 2007); Frank M. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
Its purpose is to encourage full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am
One year later, the regulatory environment continues to revamp with new rules being issued constantly in the United States to conform to the legislative mandates set forth in the Dodd Frank Act. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 9:29 am
In the first case granted today, Frank v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:16 pm
Satava v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:31 am
The company’s shareholders included Frank (37%), Daniel (38%), and Daniel’s step-sister (25%). [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:16 pm
Satava v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:31 pm
Superior Court.2013In American Express Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:10 am
Edwards v. [read post]
