Search for: "German v. German"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 5,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
To understand why the federal guidelines for drug offenses need to be revised, read Judge Gleeson’s full opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 6:07 am
In fact, I made a correction earlier today to last week's report on Judge Voss's order to stay a Samsung v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:33 am
I previously attended and blogged about another Huawei v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 2:17 pm
” Yesterday, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to review the decision, granting leave to appeal in Spanish Court Two Condominium Association v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm
Russell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 2:19 am
ZTE trial, and two such trials will take place in another German city, Dusseldorf, on Thursday. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:10 pm
The reasons can be found here, in German. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:08 am
For non-Deutschsprechende [that's the German for "German-speaking", says Merpel] readers, the analysis compares the two cows more in terms of their individuality. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
Germany: People have the right to claim compensation from internet service providers (ISPs) if internet access is disrupted, as the internet is now an “essential” part of life, a German court has ruled [Reuters / Jurist]. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:40 am
This morning Judge Andreas Voss ("Voß" in German) of the Mannheim Regional Court announced an order to stay a German Samsung v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:21 am
She then turned to consider the questions referred by the German court, starting with the four substantive questions. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 7:14 am
Remarkably, this coincided with another unlikely event -- the 40th anniversary of the not-overruled-yet Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:42 am
In the summer of 1972, half a year before the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
Snap-On Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 12:08 pm
Rammeloo, p. 563 Case C-130/10 European Parliament v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:55 am
So when IPKat friend, Stephanie Bodoni (Bloomberg), alerted her to news of today's decision from the General Court in Fun Factory v OHIM concerning not one, not two, but three balls Merpel was thrilled. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
Recently, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in CW Zumbiel v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:36 am
At the ViewSonic hearing in November, Nokia presented this logic for the first time.It would be a gross exaggeration to say that Nokia is now on the winning track, especially since Judge Andreas Mueller ("Müller" in German) generally appears to be very difficult to persuade of infringement contentions (other plaintiffs also struggled in his court), but today I got the impression that Nokia's functional infringement contentions have more than enough traction that the May 29 Nokia… [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 10:01 am
Earlier today I reported on how scared HTC appears to be due to at least some (if not all) of Nokia's German patent infringement actions. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
Harney v. [read post]
