Search for: "Google, Inc"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 11,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2013, 2:43 pm
Google http://ow.ly/2BGNkd Copyright and the JFK Assassination – Fifty years ago today, which was of course long before smartphones with came… http://ow.ly/2BGPrI Cybersecurity Seminar Tackles Business Risks from Cyber Attacks http://ow.ly/2BGMgo HiSoftware Inc. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
Google Inc., 693 F.Supp.2d 370, 376 (S.D.N.Y.2010); MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
” Time Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Appeal dismissed in software copyright case SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 ) http://t.co/WViJAoCeTf -> Microsoft sues patent troll Acacia for breach of license agreement through infringement actions http://t.co/z9piqUR1iO -> Patent Reform 2013: Demand Letter Transparency Act of 2013 http://t.co/Zkk2adlR9e -> Calculating damages: every box has a silver lining … http://t.co/qUPqciBNvs -> Blah-humbug: Leaked Trade Agreement Shows (Surprise!) [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 6:04 pm
Google Inc., Case No. 3:12-CV-0504-MMD (VPC) (D. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Conservatives set to introduce cyberbullying legislation http://t.co/RgJrDuLjRh -> Governments ponder legitimacy of bitcoins http://t.co/0RgkVVQsje -> Google Inc to pay US$17M settlement over smartphone privacy breach http://t.co/FaZ62RsVh8 -> Instagram Act: http://t.co/PKrcrMho74's latest copyright landgrab stymied – for now http://t.co/ulPRLThlxN -> IIPA Study: "Core" Copyright Tops Trillion Dollars In Value To US http://t.co/FCOZde06no -> Trade secrets… [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm
Here is a link to the Google Drive containing all the documents in this case. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:54 pm
Google Inc. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:10 am
Infostream Group Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:28 pm
Things will really get interesting after the final judgment by the district court.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:45 am
Google Inc., expresando que los extractos que comparte Google Books de dichos libros no violenta la Ley de Derechos de Autor porque su uso es transformativo y provee beneficios públicos significativos. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:23 am
The fifth one of seven legislative recommendations made by the White House Task Force on High-Tech Patent Issues in June was to "[c]hange the ITC standard for obtaining an injunction to better align it with the traditional four-factor test in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Google Inc., S.D.N.Y., No. 1:05-cv-08136-DC, 1:05-cv-08136, 05-cv-8136, 11/14/13.PW reports that "After years of fair use legal wrangling, the case wasn’t even close. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 7:34 am
In a November 14, 2013 decision, Judge Denny Chin (continuing a case in which he presided before joining the Second Circuit) granted summary judgment in favor of Google, Inc in the long-running case by The Authors Guild, Inc. based on the fair use defense to copyright infringement. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:32 pm
Google Inc. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:23 pm
Google Inc. [read post]
Google Books’ Scanning and Snippet Display of Books Is Fair Use, and Thus Not Copyright Infringement
14 Nov 2013, 10:54 am
Google Inc. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:27 am
Was On Press Inc. demanding that we few, we happy few, be REMOVED FROM THE GOOGLE IMMEDIATELY? [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:16 am
In this case, a Spanish citizen lodged a complaint against Google Spain and Google Inc. before the Spanish Data Protection Agency (“AEPD”) because Google refused to take down data that appeared when his name was entered in the search engine. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:16 am
In this case, a Spanish citizen lodged a complaint against Google Spain and Google Inc. before the Spanish Data Protection Agency (“AEPD”) because Google refused to take down data that appeared when his name was entered in the search engine. [read post]
