Search for: "High v State"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
On Septemeber 15, 2011, an Indiana United States District Court found that a reasonable jury could find that employee, a 63-year old employee at Knauf GmbH (“Knauf”), a German company, was terminated because of his age and his claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
On Septemeber 15, 2011, an Indiana United States District Court found that a reasonable jury could find that employee, a 63-year old employee at Knauf GmbH (“Knauf”), a German company, was terminated because of his age and his claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:53 am
It requires that companies provide consumers with clear information about their practices and privacy protections through a “high-level privacy policy overview. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted Mayo's petition for certiorari in Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted Mayo's petition for certiorari in Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:53 am
Harris and Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:48 am
Anyone reading only these passages would be forgiven for assuming that no duty of care would have been imposed on the police in this case, given the long and consistent line of high authority which appeared to have been stated in firm terms that no such duty arises should be imposed on the police public policy grounds. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:41 am
Supreme Court Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Constantine, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2406 (26 October 2010) T, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 (26 October 2010) Wakeling, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2210 (15 September 2010) Qayum, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2237 (16 September 2010) Cooper, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2335 (20 September 2010) Nuthoo, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2383… [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:25 am
In Justin Mayhew v (1) Philip King (2) Milbank Trucks Ltd (Defendants) & Chaucer Insurance plc (Third Party and Part 20 Claimant) v Towergate Stafford Knight Company Limited & Ors Sir Edward Evans-Lombe held that a term of a settlement agreement which stated that a right to an indemnity would cease if the party with the benefit of the indemnity went into administration was contrary to the anti-deprivation principle and would be struck out.The claimant, Justin… [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:25 am
In Justin Mayhew v (1) Philip King (2) Milbank Trucks Ltd (Defendants) & Chaucer Insurance plc (Third Party and Part 20 Claimant) v Towergate Stafford Knight Company Limited & Ors Sir Edward Evans-Lombe held that a term of a settlement agreement which stated that a right to an indemnity would cease if the party with the benefit of the indemnity went into administration was contrary to the anti-deprivation principle and would be struck out.The claimant, Justin… [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:59 am
Although Kansas state courts have yet to address the issue, a federal district court in Kansas found that the state high court would conclude that an employee fired because her brother (and coworker) filed an OSHA complaint could state a claim for retaliatory discharge in violation of public policy. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:28 am
In the UK, the Lady Gaga v Lady Goo Goo (High Court) precedent would certainly give the outcome that the parody constitutes trademark infringement under Article 10 (3) of the UK Trade Marks Act since it takes unfair advantage of the high fashion brands’ market. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:45 am
This test was considered in the House of Lords in British Coal Corporation v Smith and others [1996] ICR 515. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
The court stated that claim construction implies construing the use of drafting techniques (Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:05 pm
Whitford, Wisconsin) and timing (Benisek v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 12:15 am
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in Corder v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:12 am
Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:42 am
State ex rel Kutil & Hess v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 7:50 am
State. [read post]
