Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 3,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2024, 11:09 am
If you do not file or file late, you may be subject to penalties as listed in Title 26 of the United States Code. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
State of Ohio, No.7-3808 (6th Cir. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am
The Government has already ruled out extending the points-based visa system, the current immigration policy applied to immigrants from outside the EU, to EU passport holders. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:30 am
United States is more satisfying than the majority on several counts. [read post]
28 Aug 2021, 4:17 pm
R. 201 The United States’ Supreme Court further enshrined this counselor-patient privilege as being fundamental. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
Seilkop v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
The United States Supreme Court has stated that by assuring confidentiality the privilege encourages clients to make `full and frank disclosures to their attorneys, who are then better able to provide candid advice and effective representation. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 9:22 pm
Google Book Search users in the United States will be able to enjoy and purchase the products and services offered under the project. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm
[1] Complaint at 1-2, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
The Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:17 pm
In an amicus brief filed in Davidson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
United States was only the latest episode in Hamdan’s long journey through the U.S. legal system—a journey that has had important implications for U.S. law. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
Only one unreversed Supreme Court majority opinion has upheld a content-based speech restriction on strict scrutiny grounds — last year’s Holder v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm
More recently though, the Court stated in 2014 in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. [read post]
