Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 6,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
McCain v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:43 am
When the checks arrived at the company's post office box, Tamatha removed [them] and . . . gave them to her husband . . . [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In his January 7, 2013 decision in Gluck v. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Korem 2012 NSCA 124Family Law - Husband and wife – Actions between husband and wife – Practice – Settlements (incl. enforcement of) A Family Division judge issued an order on July 6, 2012, following a settlement conference with the parties (Ms. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 2:00 am
Halliday v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
McCain 2012 ONSC 7344[1] The Applicant, Christine McCain (“the Wife”) brings a Motion seeking the following interim/temporary relief from the Court in her Application against the Respondent, Michael McCain (“the Husband”): . . . . [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:16 am
Husband filed writ petition with SC claiming Wife’s motion was actually motion for change of custody that lacked requisite affidavits, relying on Brockman v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 2:00 am
’s Comment: The Court’s reasoning is consistent with its decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
The wife appealed the trial judge’s (1) treatment of the husband’s property interests at the date of marriage; (2) determination of the value of her business; and (3) determination of the value of the household items. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
As state laws about marriage showed, the laws assumed those marrying would be “bride and groom” “husband and wife. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:35 am
Thus, the CaseyCourt struck down a spousal notification provision that was eerily reminiscent of the common law’s enforcement of a hierarchical relationship between husband and wife. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:17 pm
Bowers, 349 S.C. 85, 561 S.E.2d 610 (Ct.App.2002), specifically states: We further find no error in the Family Court’s failure to expressly consider tax consequences resulting from its award to Wife of one-half the value of Husband’s 401(k) account. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
United States, 12-6988, also out of the Fifth Circuit, concerns the male half of a husband-and-wife taxpayer-preparation operation tried for aiding and assisting the filing of false tax returns. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:30 am
App. 2002) (holding that evidence supported custody award of three-year-old child to husband, despite the fact that the wife had been the child’s primary caretaker, when wife committed adultery and became pregnant with paramour’s child before she separated from husband); Graham v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:00 am
Irvin v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:41 am
The former wife opposed the motion, arguing that the husband’s motion was not adequately supported, and therefore he had not established a prima facie change of circumstances.The trial court agreed, and denied the husband’s motion. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 10:09 am
Reversed and remanded.Case Name: STEPHEN SMITH and AUDREY SMITH, husband and wife v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:30 am
Further, it is interesting in light of Chief Justice Kenyon’s views as expressed in Marshall to consider who was held liable for the wife’s “necessaries” in cases decided in the years that followed, especially when the husband’s behavior toward the wife was violent, brutish, or shockingly dismissive. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 5:04 pm
The couple lived together as husband and wife until July of 1961. [read post]
