Search for: "J True" Results 3481 - 3500 of 7,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2013, 1:28 pm by Jeff Gamso
I thought I was done with this piece of news for a while, but then along came Wesley J. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In doing that, the plaintiffs’ evidence is accepted as true, and the defendants’ evidence is evaluated only to determine if it defeats the plaintiffs’ showing as a matter of law. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
"Hearn, J.: "Based on our doctrine of deference to ecclesiastical authority, the Appellants represent the true Lower Diocese of the Protestant Episcopal Church in South Carolina and are therefore entitled to all property, including Camp Saint Christopher and the emblems, seals, and trademarks associated with the National Church. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
The TRUE project seeks to explore the impact of deepfakes on trust in user-generated evidence in accountability processes for human rights violations. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:34 pm by Elder C. Marques
If it were true, none of the plaintiffs would have a claim and therefore it did not affect whether certification was appropriate. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:34 pm by Elder C. Marques
If it were true, none of the plaintiffs would have a claim and therefore it did not affect whether certification was appropriate. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 5:41 pm
*) if this_disk is in these_volumes then (* iterate through all files in the root of disk *) set the file_list to every file of item i of volume_list repeat with j from 1 to number of items in file_list (* check to see if a backup script is available *) set this_file to name of item j of file_list if this_file is in backup_scripts then open item j of file_list (* run the backup script *) end if end repeat … [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
  [118] The Court of Appeal also accepted Tugendhat J’s view that, after the Human Rights Act 1998, “lingering doubts” could not be resolved in favour of publication: Articles 8 and 10 were of equal value ([21]). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
He was not impressed by the argument that the mere report of allegations was covered by Reynolds: “The fact that an unidentified insider has given specific information which, if true, may incriminate a claimant, will very rarely be justifiable reportage. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
  [118] The Court of Appeal also accepted Tugendhat J’s view that, after the Human Rights Act 1998, “lingering doubts” could not be resolved in favour of publication: Articles 8 and 10 were of equal value ([21]). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:56 am
If his pockets contain a cell phone, however, that is no longer true. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
More generally, Judge Sykes’ concurring opinion seemed more dubious of such an injunction’s propriety, citing for example, the possibility that even if a statement is false or uttered with the relevant mens rea when made, it may become true later or, at least, the defendant’s mens rea (or the relevant standard of care!) [read post]
Many readers will recall Marcus Smith J’s decision to refuse a PI (reported here and, after it was upheld by the Court of Appeal, here). [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
ABC News reports that Fairfax has been criticised by the judge in the Chau Chak Wing defamation case for using MP’s comments as proof that allegations of bribery were true. [read post]