Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 3481 - 3500 of 120,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2019, 9:10 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
However, as we have previously reported, recent Australian cases (such as Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America LLC [2016] FCAFC 92 (Lodestar)) demonstrated that licensing arrangements may expose trade mark owners to the risk of trade mark removal. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:10 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
However, as we have previously reported, recent Australian cases (such as Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America LLC [2016] FCAFC 92 (Lodestar)) demonstrated that licensing arrangements may expose trade mark owners to the risk of trade mark removal. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:10 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
However, as we have previously reported, recent Australian cases (such as Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America LLC [2016] FCAFC 92 (Lodestar)) demonstrated that licensing arrangements may expose trade mark owners to the risk of trade mark removal. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:10 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
However, as we have previously reported, recent Australian cases (such as Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America LLC [2016] FCAFC 92 (Lodestar)) demonstrated that licensing arrangements may expose trade mark owners to the risk of trade mark removal. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:57 am by Eric Goldman
This is particularly true concerning a thumbs up emoji which may convey different meanings. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:51 am by Jeff Welty
The few cases that I could find from other jurisdictions disagree about the propriety of the conduct: United States v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:51 am by Jeff Welty
The few cases that I could find from other jurisdictions disagree about the propriety of the conduct: United States v. [read post]
During FINRA’s 2023 Annual Conference held on May 16-18, 2023, several panels provided insight into how FINRA is currently using CAT data for market surveillance and how FINRA plans to use the data going forward to both develop more sophisticated surveillance reviews and further promote industry-wide efficiencies. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm by Victoria VanBuren
by Alan Scott Rau Some of the readers of this blog may have missed the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Cape Flattery Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
The only countervailing example depends on whether consumers knew the Comphy brand before arriving: “If Defendant uses COMPHY to sell ‘Comfy Sheets’ to a customer who intends to buy ‘Comphy Sheets’ and has independently chosen to shop on Defendant’s site, there may or may not be confusion. [read post]