Search for: "Matter of John D." Results 3481 - 3500 of 6,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2012, 11:38 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Michael Morton was finally granted DNA testing not because John Bradley suddenly saw the light on the road to Damascus, but because the law changed and the grounds on which he'd previously objected to DNA testing under Ch. 64 suddenly vanished. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
“But the chair put other matters on the agenda. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:36 pm by Jonathan Bailey
To make matters worse, this isn’t the first time Noah has faced allegations of being a plagiarist. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Florida Court Review, John Cavaliere looks at Reynolds v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 4:53 am
You could try to attack my credibility, but since I'm saying I heard this story from John Doe, and I trust John Doe, you're pretty well stymied in attacking the inherent believability and accuracy of the axe murderer story. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:30 pm by Dan Pinnington
In order to protect against possible liability exposure to non-clients, a lawyer or law firm should take the following steps in writing (and ideally also verbally) any time they consult with potential clients but have not been retained: a) confirm that they have not been retained; b) warn that the potential client’s claim is subject to a limitation period (and a notice period, if applicable) and that it is imperative that any lawsuit be commenced prior to the expiry of the limitation period;… [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
Going after John Barrow was silly. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:30 am by jonathanturley
” That may be the best summary of the findings of special prosecutor John Durham in his 305-page report issued yesterday. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:11 pm
Personally, I'd say that OLC's obligations are in some respects more demanding than those required by ordinary ethics rules -- but in any event, they're different; and my inclination is to say that ordinary ethics rules therefore don't really capture what is at stake here.Moreover, what would it mean to conclude, for example, that John Yoo's legal advice on the NSA matter -- apparently that the President has an article II authority to disregard… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:42 am by Steve Hall
And:Update: John Bradley has just addressed the jurisdictional memo at the meeting. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:55 pm by Ilya Somin
All that matters is the House of Commons, dominated by the prime minister’s party. [read post]