Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 22,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Section 8371.In Rancosky, the Supreme Court adopted the two-part test enunciated in the case of Terletsky v. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:09 am
Thus, the law makers have maintained a clear distinction between the rules of procedure to be adopted by the Company Court under the Companies (Courts) Rules, 1959 and the rules of procedure to be adopted by the Company Law Board under the Regulations of 1991. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
The judge at first instance granted the order, but it was quashed by the High Court on an application for judicial review on the grounds that the procedure adopted was unfair to the respondent. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
The judge at first instance granted the order, but it was quashed by the High Court on an application for judicial review on the grounds that the procedure adopted was unfair to the respondent. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:49 am
In deciding this case, as a matter of first impression in this circuit, the court held that the accrual rule that applies to claims of ownership also applies to claims of copyright infringement based on ownership. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:49 am
It was a matter of happenstance that the laws challenged in New York [v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 4:47 pm
The provisions on jurisdiction in REJ Arrangement are in fact based on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention, and adopt the review model of “exclusive jurisdiction exclusion” plus “enumeration”. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
Mar. 30, 2017)Some mention of my previous blogging on the issue, but that doesn’t matter to the ultimate result (though the court at least notices the incontestability problem). [read post]
17 May 2012, 11:57 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, may keep federal authorities from adopting the new rules. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:44 am
Typical pro bono work is in chancery court handling domestic matters such as divorces, guardianships and child custody disputes. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
Under the new rule, codified at 29 C.F.R. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
Laster went on to say that the Louisiana action is “quite obviously violative” of the forum selection provision in Edgen’s charter, which Laster found to be “valid as a matter of Delaware corporate law. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 3:55 pm
In reaching this ruling, Vice-Chancellor Laster said that while Delaware law permits companies to adopt a forum selection clause for “internal affairs” claims, owing to what Laster describes as “first principles” Delaware law “does not authorize a Delaware corporation to regulate external relationships. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Is it only federal financial assistance from HHS that matters for this determination? [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:45 am
” 102(a)(2) serves an important role in post-AIA law because it codifies the rules of the first-inventor-to-file regime. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:00 am
The proposed regulations are described as follows: R067-11: Relating to Registered Agents; adopting certain requirements for entities that act as registered agents; adopting provisions relating to service of process, governing written materials produced by registered agents, demands for information under certain circumstances, and setting forth certain actions which the Secretary of State will take when a registered agent is enjoined from acting as a registered agent and… [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 10:07 am
The court itself admits that this ruling is predicated on ancient views of women as chattel whose value is lost upon penetration, rather than independent human beings whose suffering matters. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:21 am
While it’s likely that the “say on pay” rules will be similar to the advisory vote rules the SEC adopted in 2009 for TARP companies, the commission also will have to address the separate shareholder votes in 2011 on the frequency of future advisory votes.The commission said it doesn’t plan to adopt final rules on compensation committees and pay consultants until April to July 2011. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 1:56 am
The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) of Pakistan ruled on March 31, 2007 that a woman who is raped should not be considered guilty of adultery and should be viewed under the law as a victim of rape.The ruling may reduce the impact of the Hudood Ordinances adopted in Pakistan in 1979 under which in order to prove her case, a woman has to produce four adult Muslim men as witnesses to testify before an Islamic court that they saw the forced sexual act. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:56 am
See summary of prior Chancery decision in this matter here. [read post]
