Search for: "People v Childs" Results 3481 - 3500 of 6,936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2010, 9:01 am by rdasgupta
Nevertheless, to some, recent case law interpreting the statute – such as the Central District of Illinois’s 2009 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Texas and the Emergence of Mexican American Lawyering (Publico Press in 2006); Education Law Stories (Foundation Press, 2007); No Undocumented Child Left Behind (NYU Press, 2012); and Suing Alma Mater: Higher Education and the Courts (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013). [3] See Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
It appears that Georgia attorneys representing injured people may have to give up on direct attacks on the state adoption of Daubert, and do the harder work in each case of beating defense Daubert motions and making offensive use of Daubert against defense expert. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:35 am by Thomas Swartz
"  The Court of Appeals was face with this issue yesterday in People v Knox, 2009 NY Slip Op 01156.The case actually involved three separate criminal cases. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:35 am by Thomas Swartz
"  The Court of Appeals was face with this issue yesterday in People v Knox, 2009 NY Slip Op 01156.The case actually involved three separate criminal cases. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
Another classic illustration is a parent warning an adult child about a rumor that the child's prospective spouse or lover is untrustworthy. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
A likelihood of confusion between similar marks is not determined on whether people will be confused between the marks, but rather whether the marks will confuse people into believing that the marks’ goods or services derive from the same origin or sponsorship: Paula Payne Prods. [read post]