Search for: "People v. Commons" Results 3481 - 3500 of 14,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
In doing so, it sought to amend the law in order to allow sex-trade workers to hire and get help from people who don’t exploit them, such as bodyguards and drivers. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm by Kevin
Again, this is under the current laws passed by usurpers, but still, I think something more dramatic than just showing up is going to be necessary if Allan V. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
When Texas faced similar litigation over prison conditions years ago in Ruiz v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 7:38 am by David Pocklington
In a later case of nuisance by interference with the enjoyment of residential property (Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2023] UKSC 4), the Supreme Court made it clear that there is no need, or any justification, for invoking human rights law when the common law has already developed tried and tested principles, under the tort of nuisance, which determine when liability arises for this type of legal wrong [16]. [read post]