Search for: "Person v. Person" Results 3481 - 3500 of 123,220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
§ 77q(a) (“It shall be unlawful for any person in the offer or sale of any securities …”). [7] See Aaron v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Moreover, selection procedures that purposefully exclude black persons from juries undermine public confidence in the fairness of our system of justice. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:09 am by Yosi Yahoudai
She used another person’s Lyft account to request the ride at about 1:45 a.m. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:09 am by Yosi Yahoudai
She used another person’s Lyft account to request the ride at about 1:45 a.m. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
At the age of 37, he will be the youngest person ever to serve as a bishop in the Church in Wales. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 6:57 pm by Howard Gutman
A class action involves a claim for a large group of persons. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:58 am by SHG
Making videos of small animals being crushed by high heels may be protected First Amendment activity (really, see United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm
This is a pretty good opinion to figure out where you generally stand on the resentencing provisions of Section 1172.6, which "amend[ed] the felony murder rule and the natural and probable consequences doctrine, as it relates to murder, to ensure that murder liability is not imposed on a person who is not the actual killer, did not act with the intent to kill, or was not a major participant in the underlying felony who acted with reckless indifference to human life. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:55 am by McCulloch & Miller, PLLC
The beneficiary: a trust’s beneficiary is the person (or group of persons) receiving assets from the trust. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am by CMS
In this post, Jaspal Pachu, Graham Muir and Jasleen Kaur at CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Vermilion Holdings Ltd [2023] UKSC 37, which was handed down on 25 October 2023. [read post]