Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 4,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2012, 4:06 pm
The criteria for judicial review of a hearing and a Judge's decision are set out in The Queen on the application of Strickson v Preston County Court & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 1132, to the effect that the Administrative Court must be "vigilant to see that only truly exceptional cases - where there has indeed been a frustration or corruption of the judicial process - are allowed to proceed to judicial review". [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
The Queen, [1980] 1 SCR 821. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Dukes v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
— Erica Friesen Online Learning SpecialistLederman Law Library, Queen’s Law ____________________ [1] CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 10:40 am
(The Queen of Drama) Liar and cheater. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:39 am
Cal.) in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:30 am
All of we know of this year’s spike in cases is an overall number of claims registered in the Royal Courts of Justice Queen’s Bench division, classified as ‘defamation’ (now buried away in a quarterly report). [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 6:56 am
People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 2:17 am
Queens County 2009). [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
In McCabe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm
Magic Circle v ‘Lesser’ Firms…. will it ever change? [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Court of Queen’s Bench. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:45 am
[See: R. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:34 am
In People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:54 am
The sentence imposed (in Regina v D – 12 months) , although severe, could not be interfered with. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
If Justice Breyer’s opinion in Van de Kamp seems to facially conflict with Connick v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
I raise the question in light of a recent decision in Scibelli v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:45 am
[See: R. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 5:45 pm
In the case of Ramirez v. [read post]
