Search for: "Robert Thomas" Results 3481 - 3500 of 10,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2018, 11:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
  He lists the numbers for the last seven such cases (Bork, Souter, Thomas, Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Gorsuch). [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm by Adam Feldman
Since the 2000 term, if we take this bloc to be composed of Chief Justices William Rehnquist and John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, Kennedy sided against at least three of these justices in the following number of decisions per term. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 2:55 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Might he even be as ultraconservative as Clarence Thomas? [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
He was joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:16 am by Mark Walsh
One technician mentions that Judge Thomas Hardiman of the 3rd Circuit, another of the four finalists (and one of the two “final” finalists), attended the University of Notre Dame in South Bend, so that would be a story for that crew. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:25 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
La sentencia fue redactada por el juez John Roberts, y respaldada por los jueces Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas Samuel Alito y Neil Gorsuch, en una votación de 5 votos a favor y 4 en contra. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:20 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For the past dozen years, he’s been a fixture in the DC courts, which have produced other SCOTUS Justices, including Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:23 pm by Jon Levitan
Early coverage comes from Mark Landler and Maggie Haberman of The New York Times; Greg Stohr, Jennifer Jacobs and Jennifer Epstein of Bloomberg; and Robert Costa Robert Barnes and Felicia Sonmez of The Washington Post. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
Hence Scalia and Thomas siding with Justices Ginsburg and Kagan in 2014 to let Maryland impose double taxes on residents with out-of-state investments. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:23 am by Kent Scheidegger
Indeed, it is constitutionally insufficient.Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito didn't/don't seem to have a problem "enforc[ing] jury recommendations of death," but if Judge Barrett does and would feel compelled to recuse herself from a large and important chunk of the high court's workload, that would be a huge problem. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Robert Costa and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post report that Trump said yesterday he was “close” to a final decision; Maggie Haberman, Adam Liptak and Michael Schmidt of The New York Times report that “he might need to extend the process well into Monday. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:17 am by Larisa Vaysman
He would also build on the textualist approach embraced by Justices Thomas and Gorsuch—one that in recent years has had important and fresh implications for administrative practice. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm by Amy Howe
Like Thomas Hardiman, another potential nominee on the president’s shortlist, Judge Raymond Kethledge would bring educational diversity to a bench on which all of the current justices attended Ivy League law schools: He received both his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Michigan. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:50 am by Sherry Colb
Becerra, Thomas, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, Kennedy, Alito and Justice Neil Gorsuch, said that California could not compel “crisis pregnancy centers” – anti-abortion operations —  to inform patients about available, government-subsidized abortion services. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Lillian Beview observes that another reported frontrunner, Judge Amul Thapar, with whom she has co-taught a class about judicial philosophy, “has a great deal in common with Justice Thomas. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Justice Thomas, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Alito, and Gorsuch, invalidated the California statute. [read post]