Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 3481 - 3500 of 5,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
Finally, we reject defendant’s further contention that the police were required to obtain a new search warrant before searching the property seized pursuant to the May 2009 warrant. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:55 pm
The question before the Court is whether the Fourth Amendment Right to Privacy, which protects citizens from illegal searches and seizures, prohibits placement of GPS devices on citizen's cars without consent or warrant. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:32 am
The warrant was valid for seizure of the computers for evidence of computer trespass at his house via the IP address in use by him at the time of the intrusion, and then the search. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:42 am
Seizure of items in plain view was also justified since the warrant made them lawfully on the premises. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:38 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
-is lobbying Congress to update the law to require search warrants in more digital investigations. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:38 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
-is lobbying Congress to update the law to require search warrants in more digital investigations. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:18 am by Michael DelSignore
In the case, the police obtained a warrant to monitor the activity of defendant Jones; however, the warrant expired, meaning that no valid search warrant authorized the GPS monitoring. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:55 pm
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which applies to the citizens of San Antonio, states that: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:28 am by admin
There is no search or seizure when that is obtained, because there isn’t a reasonable expectation of privacy? [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:31 am by emp
Chehil’s Charter right to be free from an unreasonable search and seizure and excluded the results of the search. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:50 am
In general, a search is considered unreasonable unless it is accompanied by a judicial warrant issued following a finding of probable cause. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:23 am
November 14, 2011): United Space next argues that the OFCCP request for additional data violated the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:58 pm by Hance Haney
The Bill of Rights protects each of us against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:14 am
At trial, the accused challenged the constitutional validity of wiretaps and whether wiretapping without a warrant in urgent situations breaches the Charter’s protection against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in August, I wrote a post complimenting the 2nd on the general quality of its opinions, but lamenting that it had a poor reputation on search and seizure cases. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm by Steve Statsinger
Simmons told the officers the gun was in his bedroom and they went in, retrieved it, and arrested him.The circuit found that the officers’ questions to Simmons about the gun were covered by the “public safety” exception to Miranda, but nevertheless, the majority held that the district court erred in finding that there were exigent circumstances supporting the seizure of the gun itself.The court began with the “core premise” that a warrantless search of… [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
In this respect, § 2703 orders are more like search warrants than grand jury subpoenas. [read post]