Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 121,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2012, 11:10 am
See Centocor Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 1:55 pm
Updating this June 12th ILB entry on the Supreme Court's 4-1 decision June 10th in the case of Sophia Willis v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 12:25 am
(See prior posting.) [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 12:10 am
(See prior posting.) [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:33 pm
Thanks to this post at AL&P, I see an interesting admission by the government of sentencing error in the unpublished disposition in US v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 3:42 pm
In Netherland v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm
See Judulang v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:12 pm
Law Lessons from JOEL SCOTT ISAACSON V. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 12:55 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 10:40 am
See United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:49 pm
See Rea v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm
As detailed in a post last Fall (see) in People v Colville (79 AD3d 189 [2nd Dept 2010]) the Second Department, without reaching a decision on the issue, engaged in detailed review of the arguments as to whether the decision to submit a lesser included offense is a fundamental one that must be made by the defendant or is a strategic one that can be made by counsel. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 5:55 am
Howard, et al. - see July 17th ILB entry here (2nd case). [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm
Following his arrest, many assumed that Tsarnaev would be read his rights under Miranda v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:55 am
Yesterday the Utah Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:59 am
(See Clemens v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:46 pm
See: Caldwell v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 4:18 am
This Friday, Sept. 14th at 9:30 am, oral arguments before the 7th Circuit in the case of Indiana Right Life v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 6:46 am
., d/b/a Aquasource v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm
As detailed in a post last Fall (see) in People v Colville (79 AD3d 189 [2nd Dept 2010]) the Second Department, without reaching a decision on the issue, engaged in detailed review of the arguments as to whether the decision to submit a lesser included offense is a fundamental one that must be made by the defendant or is a strategic one that can be made by counsel. [read post]