Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 3,989
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2009, 3:38 pm
Xu v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 3:22 pm
Earlier this year, the Idaho Supreme Court in Ray v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:54 am
State contract law, however, is the ultimate arbiter of whether a contract actually “obligates” a seller to erect a building within two years. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:55 am
Klein
NEW YORK COUNTYContractsPurchaser Entitled to Summary Judgment Dismissing Seller's Complaint Alleging Breach of Contract Vic's Parking Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
Bledsoe admits to paying a third party to purchase her a handgun from a federally-licensed seller. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 7:14 pm
” The case cite is CytoSport, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 11:10 am
” These types of claims, the Court stated, “lie outside of the economic loss rule. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Against this background the author discusses, in the context of refusal to supply abuses both in and outside an IP context, the operationalisation of the criterion of harm to consumers (section IV) before concluding (section V). [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
In People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:12 am
See Klay v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:47 pm
The short seller will “kick the sector when it’s already down, making a hefty profit in the process. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 6:03 am
The judges stated that their decision promotes an important goal of the Dram Shop Act, namely motivating sellers of alcohol to exercise greater care in their sales. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
In Stein v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
In Stein v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 11:02 am
That will now change, given the Supreme Court of Wisconsin's decision in Star Direct v. [read post]
