Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp" Results 3481 - 3500 of 4,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2010, 11:15 am by David Luban
Indeed, the colloquial "water torture" references in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Anna Christensen
Additional information on the case is available on the Lewis v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
Co. v Doll (Filewrapper) US: District Court Massachusetts denies bid for bench trial in RNAi patent suit: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Patent Docs) US: Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit: Federal jurisdiction found in Neuralstem v Reneuron (Patent Docs) US: District Court New Jersey: Disqualification of counsel in patent case requires ‘factual analysis’, not ‘automatic disqualification rule’: Wyeth et al… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
Co. v Doll (Filewrapper) US: District Court Massachusetts denies bid for bench trial in RNAi patent suit: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Patent Docs) US: Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit: Federal jurisdiction found in Neuralstem v Reneuron (Patent Docs) US: District Court New Jersey: Disqualification of counsel in patent case requires ‘factual analysis’, not ‘automatic disqualification rule’: Wyeth et al… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:54 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Garside v Black Horse Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC 190 (QB) (12 February 2010) Pankhurst v White [2010] EWHC 311 (QB) (18 February 2010) Malone & Ors v British Airways Plc [2010] EWHC 302 (QB) (19 February 2010) Sabin v BRB (Residuary) Ltd [2010] EWHC 267 (QB) (19 February 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Thomas & Anor v BPE Solicitors (A Firm) [2010] EWHC 306 (Ch) (19 February 2010) Royal Society for the… [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 10:08 am by David Doniger
Court of Appeals in Washington under the name Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 11:50 am by Kevin Smith
  All of that seemed to be resolved in favor of patenting business method software, but a case currently before the Supreme Court, called Bilski v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
”The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth’ (Masson v New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 US 496, 516… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am by Matt Sundquist
The Court recently granted the NRA’s request to participate in the oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Fresno Valves (PATracer) Cummins – Cummins appeals from summary judgment finding declaratory judgment action for patent invalidity, misuse and contract termination barred under doctrine of claim preclusion: Cummins v TAS Distribution (PATracer) Sharp Corporation - ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-702) against Samsung regarding certain liquid crystal display modules (ITC blog) (ITC Blog)   US Copyright Will your big-screen Super Bowl party violate copyright law? [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 4:24 pm by Don Cruse
The absence of any such opinions so far this year marks a sharp departure from 2008 and 2009, when the Court issued around 50 separate opinions per year. 2 This might just be the luck of the draw. [read post]