Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 3481 - 3500 of 7,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2017, 6:02 am
Prior decisions had limited “domestic” transactions to ones where (1) the purchaser “incurred irrevocable liability within the United States to take and pay for a security … or to deliver a security” or (2) “legal title to the security … transferred in the United States” (see, e.g., Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by Rachael Hanna
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-6602; Cox v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by John Stigi
Mar. 19, 2014), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Boyle, J.) denied lead plaintiff’s class certification motion in a consolidated action alleging claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
To an observer from the United States, one of the most striking things about Israel, and the Middle East in general, is how small it is. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am by Kristian Soltes
This competitor has outpaced Delaware’s legislative progress, is purported by Forbes to be the “Delaware of digital asset law,” and has sparked rumors that it could chip away at Delaware’s dominance as the corporate capital of the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Herbert Hovenkamp
For example, in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
Lord Neuberger and Lord Dyson referred to the four-limb test for proportionality in respect of interference with Convention rights as espoused by Lord Reed in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 39. [read post]