Search for: "State v. Bias" Results 3481 - 3500 of 5,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am by Joy Waltemath
Although the court granted summary judgment in her favor on her state-law marital status discrimination claim, it denied the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment on her state and federal gender and pregnancy bias claims (Richardson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:14 am by David Kopel
In Europe in the twentieth century, states murdered about 87.1 million people. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:02 pm by cdw
From the intro: Leading off this week is a noncapital case from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Comm. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:50 am by boston
“To insist that the government respect the separation of church and state is not to discriminate against religion; indeed, it promotes a respect for religion by refusing to single out any creed for official favor at the expense of all others,” observed Stearns in the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 12:14 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
" This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court case styled, Liberty National Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 6:16 am by Joy Waltemath
Therefore, it affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer, the Illinois Department of Human Services, on her pay bias claims brought under the Equal Pay Act, Title VII, and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (Lauderdale v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:34 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run May 10, 2009. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
In Thompson v North American Stainless, LP, a male employee, who alleged that he was fired shortly after his fiancée filed an EEOC sex-bias charge against their shared employer, had no reprisal claim under Title VII. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
Another exercise in extra-legal bias by this corrupt court. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]