Search for: "State v. Master"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 3,868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2009, 9:46 pm
Yesterday, on 28 April 2009, the ECJ delivered its judgment in case C-420/07 (Meletis Apostolides v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:54 am
Ortiz v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:43 am
FEDERAL JUDGE EXPANDS COVERAGE FOR PLAN B, Tummino v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
AA/EOE/M/W/D/V NO PHONE CALLS, ELECTRONIC INQUIRIES, OR FAXES ACCEPTED [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:04 pm
One answer may be found in a decision by EDNY Judge Gleeson, United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 9:53 am
Lewis' book tells the story of the landmark 1964 case of New York Times v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:49 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 8:27 pm
As the court said in Demarzo v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
State, 805 N.E.2d 835, 2004 Ind. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 1:03 pm
Because eBay isn't a state actor, however, the court dismissed eBay [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:20 am
The Supreme Court decision Dred Scott v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:50 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
Nothing in CAFA suggests that plaintiffs, as masters of their complaint, may not “file multiple actions, each with fewer than 100 plaintiffs, to work within the confines of CAFA to keep their state-law claims in state court. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
This information was enough to satisfy the Master that Facebook would be effective in bringing knowledge of the legal proceedings to the attention of the defendants.2 Facebook, for its part, was quite happy with the result, stating: “We’re pleased to see the Australian court validate Facebook as a reliable, secure and private medium for communication. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 9:50 am
That is the issue that the Court said it would consider at a hearing in South Carolina v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
A special master recommended [report, PDF] that three parties - the city of Charlotte, North [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:02 am
The Court said it would hear oral argument, presumably at its next Term, on a report by a Special Master on the pending dispute between the two Carolina states (South Carolina v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:30 pm
From the Fairly Used Blog For background, see Jonathan Pink interviews: District Court Invalidates Portion of Copyright Act as Unconstitutional; Holds State University and Employee Immune From Claim for Copyright Infringement (April 15, 2008) and Follow up questions on state university copyright immunity case - Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:29 pm
From the Fairly Used Blog For background, see Jonathan Pink interviews: District Court Invalidates Portion of Copyright Act as Unconstitutional; Holds State University and Employee Immune From Claim for Copyright Infringement (April 15, 2008) and Follow up questions on state university copyright immunity case - Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]
