Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 3481 - 3500
of 6,780
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2018, 1:31 pm
The Facts of State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:11 am
Several months after the patent had lapsed, Shore-Sirotin learned from Honig that the patent was licensed, and immediately sent an e-mail dated March 19, 2002, referencing the patent and its United Kingdom analogue, to Pat Tormey, an Abelman legal assistant, stating, "[P]lease do NOT DROP these patents in the U.S ... [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 9:33 am
State of Indiana, an 8-page opinion (dissent beginning on p. 7), Justice Boehm writes:Frankie Allen Salyers pleaded guilty but mentally ill to the charge of murder for the kill-ing of Goshen City Police Officer Thomas Goodwin. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
P. 26(b)(2)(C) need to consider the cost, burden and necessity of preserving the information. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
[P]laintiff must point to a statute or judicial decision that clearly states such a strong public policy. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 7:24 pm
See, e.g., Morell v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Dukes, which redefined commonality and provided definitive guidance about when a party may invoke Rule 23(b)(2); AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
United States, 549 F. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
Weideman v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am
After last week’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 5:54 pm
Today, in Moody v. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 1:56 pm
The solution was suggested to me by the State's brief and its reliance on Slack v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
See Mock v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:20 am
On appeal, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia disagreed. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 7:52 am
The terminal disclaimer must disclaim the entire term or any terminal part of the term of the patent; (iii) State the present extent of the disclaimant's ownership interest in the patent. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:15 am
District Judge Gonzalo P. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:01 am
The decision in Gordon v. [read post]
