Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 3481 - 3500 of 57,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2021, 10:47 am by Jon Sands
  A divided panel said that United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 8:05 am
In a 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court held in Rita v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:05 am by Aimee Denholm
This appeal considered whether, when a confiscation order is made under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994, the words ‘the said sum… as was due at the time of the period of detention was imposed’ in the Magistrates’ Court Act 1980, s 79(2) mean the sum due when the default term was fixed by the Crown Court judge or the sum due when the default term was activated by the Magistrates’ Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
They said that this provided the basis for an injunction, having regard to the principle apparently identified by Lord Woolf, and that the defendant’s interference with the administration of the 11+ test constituted an interference with the Council’s general responsibilities pursuant to the Education Act 1996 and the School Standards Framework Act 1998. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
  Here's an excerpt:"It just boggles the mind," said one Mississippi trial lawyer quoted in the Los Angeles Times about the indictment of tort lawyer Richard "Dickie" Scruggs last week on charges of backing the attempted bribery of a state judge. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 10:08 am by Eric Goldman
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:49 pm
 Doesn't matter that the defendant knew that the actual amount at stake was much more than that, that you said "in excess" of $25,000, that you can prove actual damages of many millions of dollars, etc. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:01 am by sally
Alstom Transport v Eurostar International Ltd [2012] EWHC 28 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 4 “Regulation 3(2) of the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2006 (‘UCR’) should be construed as if it said that network ‘includes a system operated in accordance’ instead of ‘means a system operated in accordance’. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm by WIMS
The Supreme Court said, "That judgment must be reversed. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
The Supreme Court said, "That judgment must be reversed. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
The panel said that Freed can tout his official government role and accomplishments at a public Facebook page–but squelch any unwanted discussion about those accomplishments. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]