Search for: "State v. Stephens."
Results 3481 - 3500
of 7,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 6:33 pm
Concisely stated, it is the contract, and not the will, which is irrevocable (see, 38 NY Jur 2d, Decedents' Estates, § 324; see also, Glass v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:30 pm
See Baskin v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:52 pm
Stephen Saltzburg Inconsistent Jury Verdicts Abstract: This article examines United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:53 am
Bill Crawford, the petitioner in Crawford v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:42 am
This changed in 1977 with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Bates v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 2:50 pm
See Stephens v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
” Hirshman repeatedly describes O’Connor’s opinions on the Court as “tightfisted,” and she laments that, “[o]f all the hurdles the states thought up to discourage women in the years from her first abortion decision in 1983 to [Planned Parenthood v.] [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Last June, the Supreme Court’s Term ended not with the same-sex marriage opinions (announced three days earlier), but rather with Justice Stephen Breyer’s surprising and comprehensive opinion (joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg) in Glossip v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 6:42 pm
See Baskin v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:07 pm
Chicago and NRA v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:08 am
Stephen M. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:08 am
Stephen M. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:46 am
In addition to encouraging 1Ls to “soak in” the law school experience, Kagan regaled the crowd with behind-the-scenes stories about the Court, including an anecdote about how she and Justice Stephen Breyer played a violent video game for research purposes ahead of the Court’s 2011 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:40 am
Hodges to that of Texas v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 7:10 am
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:58 am
Adelman v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Chandler v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Gomez’s opposing affidavit stated that Carrillos held at most a 40% stock interest. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm
But Justice Scalia’s concurrence does not reference the question presented, but instead the transcript of the oral argument, in which Fisher’s counsel responds to a question from Justice Stephen Breyer by stating that Fisher was not arguing that the Court should overrule Grutter. [read post]
