Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 3481 - 3500 of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Never mind that ISL proponents haven’t adduced any evidence that anyone at the Founding (forget mid-19th century materials, which have no strong relevance to original public meaning in 1787) understood or discussed state legislative powers concerning federal elections to be plenary and not subject to state constitutions. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:52 am by Venkat
The decedent was domiciled in Massachusetts, and probate courts in the State of Massachusetts have a strong interest in resolving ownership questions over a resident decedent’s assets. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  In the 2004 unpublished opinion of Conahan-Baltzelle v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:22 pm by INFORRM
Although noting that states do have a margin of appreciation in this regard, it was also made clear, citing Perna v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:07 am by R.J. MacReady
Judge Meyers first noted that the State must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:19 am by Amy Howe
That is the question before the Court this morning in the case of James Castleman, in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:33 am by Ben Vernia
On June 6, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in US ex rel Foglia v Renal Ventures Mgmt, sided with the First, Fifth, and Ninth Circuits (and against the Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits), and held that the whistleblower in the declined qui tam before it need only allege the particular details of a scheme to submit false claims, along with reliable indicia that lead to a strong inference that claims were actually submitted. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm by Richard Pildes
Thus, race-based districting absent a strong basis for concluding that the VRA requires it violates the Constitution. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
Konzelman, 158 N.J. 185, 193 (1999) (stating that voluntary agreements “enabl[e] parties to order their personal lives consistently with their post-marital responsibilities” and, therefore, are given “prominence and weight”); Conforti v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 12:11 pm
Maybe we can gain insight into her mental state by looking at the numerous notes she leaves for others and she kills her children. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Scienter must meet the "strong inference" standard set out in the PSLRA. [read post]