Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 6,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2016, 8:27 am
United States by holding that Johnson pronounced “a substantive new rule” of law and, therefore, was retroactive. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:10 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Amex's motion to dismiss. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 11:58 am
Using the words of the famous 1960 United Steelworkers v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:10 pm
Instead, the Second Circuit held that Dodd-Frank does not apply extraterritorially, and because the plaintiff failed to allege that any of the events took place within the United States, Dodd-Frank did not apply. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 12:04 pm
United States (2011) for the proposition that claims based on structural provisions of the Constitution are justiciable. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:46 am
” The TDRA does not define the term “mark,” and so the Board looked to Section 45 of the Act for its meaning of “mark,” concluding that it must “at least recognize the possibility that, in an unusual case, activity outside the United States related to a mark could potentially result in the mark becoming well-known within the United States, even without any form of activity in the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm
Bay Mills Indian Community was significantly more supportive of the historical view of tribal sovereignty urged by the tribe and the United States in this case. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Someone will go seriously old skool and play Cumming v Danson or Say v Smith, the quiet one in the corner will drone on about how everyone else always forgets AG Securities, there is always an argument about Bruton, but (and if there is a point to this introduction, this is it) there is now a new giant on the scene, one judgment to rule them all and in its 9 strong constitution bind them - the Supreme Court decision in Pinnock (you might like to check out our note on the… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Someone will go seriously old skool and play Cumming v Danson or Say v Smith, the quiet one in the corner will drone on about how everyone else always forgets AG Securities, there is always an argument about Bruton, but (and if there is a point to this introduction, this is it) there is now a new giant on the scene, one judgment to rule them all and in its 9 strong constitution bind them - the Supreme Court decision in Pinnock (you might like to check out our note on the… [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:19 pm
In Yvonne Morales f/k/a Javier Morales v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 2:16 pm
Jones v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:06 am
By Dennis Crouch Magsil Corp. and MIT v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 7:06 am
The Department of Justice (DOJ) arrested him on charges of violating Title 18 United States Code, Section 113(7) (assaults within maritime and territorial jurisdiction; assault resulting in a substantial bodily injury to a spouse or intimate partner). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
Assistant to the Solicitor General Joseph Palmore appeared next, on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of Chase. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
While the days of the Puritans are long behind us, the jeremiad remains a strong and flexible staple of American political discourse. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
Fisher then petitioned to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, and the petition remains on the Court’s current docket. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
United States (Oct. 2) – How should courts interpret the federal sentencing law that allows a defendant convicted of some nonviolent drug crimes to avoid what would otherwise be a mandatory minimum sentence? [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 11:23 am
Earlier: Vinson & Elkins Raises & Bonuses: New York Happy, Texas Sad Vinson & Elkins - New York - United States - Law - Houston [read post]
