Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2015, 8:29 am
Facts: This case (UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:26 am
Under United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:08 pm
Last year it produced a terrific 9th Circuit opinion reinforcing that only the United States, not private plaintiffs, can enforce the FDCA and FDA regulations. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm
The Court, however, found that whatever anomaly might exist, it was consistent with IGRA’s history and design.[15] IGRA was enacted, the Court noted, after the Court’s decision in California v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:30 am
United States-Montes-Ruiz, No. 12-50398 (Rawlinson with Gould and Lemelle (EDLA)) --- In Setser v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 11:09 am
" California River Watch v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
Commenters on a recent thread raised some excellent questions: [LawyerHouston:] If a man from a country which allows him multiple wives moves with his wives to the United States, what is his status vis-a-vis his wives in the United States? [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 3:04 pm
To us, the decision seemed contrary to the rule stated in Branick. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Some of these activities spill over into the United States, and just in 2020, three men were arrested in Texas transporting illicit cigarettes. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:57 am
Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
Sharp v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:53 am
Handgun Control Federation of Ohio and Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
United States for this blog, with other coverage coming from Ben Einhouse and Victor Pinedo at Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am
At the New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin discusses the impact of Chief Justice John Roberts on the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 12:19 pm
Runyon, Case No. 20-cv-02130-MMC, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, ruling that information alleged to be “secret” failed to qualify as a “trade secret” under the Defend Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Pfizer stated that Corber v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:37 am
State of California, No. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
Ross, a Dormant Commerce Clause challenge to California's law barring in-state sale of animal products that fail to meet California's regulatory requirements. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
To the surprise of many, the United States’ amicus brief not only supported California but also urged that no private right of action exists for beneficiaries of federal spending programs (generally) to enforce federal standards against states. [read post]
