Search for: "United States v. Michigan"
Results 3481 - 3500
of 3,728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 5:34 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
The Court relied heavily on its 1986 ruling in Michigan v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:26 pm
Railway Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:21 am
Daniel Halberstam (University of Michigan Law School) has posted Constitutional Heterarchy: The Centrality of Conflict in the European Union and the United States (RULING THE WORLD? [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:47 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
§ 1983 against officials of the State Bar of Michigan in connection with their denial of his application for a license to practice law. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
§ 1983 against officials of the State Bar of Michigan in connection with their denial of his application for a license to practice law. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
(So the Michigan courts have ruled.) [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, seeking a preliminary injunction against an ordinance regulating sexually oriented businesses on the ground that the ordinance violated Plaintiffs-Appellants' First Amendment and Due Process rights. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 9:48 am
" United of Omaha, 960 F.2d at 34. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:32 am
Busy day in that the Sixth published four criminal cases: two direct appeals and two habeas cases.The first of the direct appeals was United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Rutter, No. 06-1473 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against several employees of the Michigan Department of Corrections challenging plaintiff's placement and continued confinement in administrative segregation, dismissal pursuant to section 1997e(c) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the district court erred in dismissing a due process claim on the ground that the duration of plaintiff's prison discipline, three years and… [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
("BWXT"), alleging that it had violated the False Claims Act ("FCA") by defrauding the United States government, in violation of 31 U.S.C. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:56 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 4:39 pm
National Pride at Work v. [read post]
