Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 3481 - 3500 of 7,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm by Daniel K. Martin, Esq.
In that case the United States Supreme Court said that it was unconstitutional for the juvenile court to convict the minor without the victim ever appearing in court.Minors do not have the same protectionsFirst of all, minors do not have a right to bail. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Knowing what you know now about the United States’s use of waterboarding and other coercive methods against detainees, do you still believe that the United States did not torture? [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Dukes: Class Action Impact & Analysis ...- SCOTUS Has Been Busy    A handful of other notable decisions from the United States Supreme Court - trending on JD Supra:Recent Supreme Court Decision May Affect Federally Funded Research (McNees)United States Supreme Court Strikes Down Vermont Pharmaceutical "Data Mining" Law (Foley Hoag)Supreme Court Strikes Two Blows Against Patient Safety (Patrick Malone & Associates)United… [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 5:02 am by Michael Broyde
Like it or not, there is not now, nor has there ever really been, only one law of the land in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
This Essay reveals the intersection of the Court’s pretext and excessive force doctrines by unearthing their shared roots in the 1973 United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm by Christa Culver
ObamaDocket: 10-775Issue(s): Whether a judicial officer of the United States, having jurisdiction of the habeas corpus petition of an alien transported by the executive to, and held at, an offshore prison, has any judicial power to direct the prisoner's release.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (D.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 7:29 am by Peter Howard Tilem
This concept, first discussed by the United States Supreme Court in the landmark case Brady v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 7:29 am by Peter Howard Tilem
This concept, first discussed by the United States Supreme Court in the landmark case Brady v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
  It described the decisions as “minor win” for the plaintiff. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Mom reasserts her First Amendment rights (as well as Equal Protection) under the United States Constitution (applicable via the 14th Amendment) and under the Nevada Constitution. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
  And the desire to obtain preclearance, the commission and the United States contend, is exactly the kind of factor that states can legitimately consider in redistricting, and which justifies minor deviations from the ideal population. [read post]