Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 3501 - 3520 of 16,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2010, 6:06 am by The Legal Blog
There is one other decision that we think would give some guidance and that is Pepsi Co. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:17 am
  As the name suggests, this award acquires its name from the well-known decision of Brightman J. in Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 798. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 9:52 pm
 He taught at the University of Michigan Law School, was a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress and at the Brookings Institute, and it looks like he’s co-written a couple of books with titles that aren’t likely to be picked for their movie rights, if you know what I mean. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 3:02 am by INFORRM
A Dawn French ad was cleared by the UK’s advertising watchdog after the title of her live show attracted complaints, but does this mean that the use of strong language in ads is now acceptable? [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by John Cannan
According to Senator David Pryor, one of the bill’s co-sponsors, the legislation would “subject the Health Care Financing Administration [HCFA] to administrative procedures act notice and comment requirements for all matters dealing with benefits. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:00 am
Maddox, who is 16 was allowed to choose how he spends his time with either parent, from June 27 to July 1 for ten hours each day. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The opponents (Os), in particular 04 in its letter of 29.12.2017,argued against a separate appealable decision on legal entitlement to priority since this would delay even further a decision on the merits of the case and by consequence decisions in the co-pending patents and would extend the legal uncertainty for the public. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Aaron R. Cooper
It very rarely curtails its Article 1 subpoena power because that authority is so critical to its constitutional responsibilities. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
" If the court finds there is no clear intent – which is often the case in dealing with a later developed technology -- the court may decide the matter based on social policy considerations.[1] That is, when the intent of the parties -- the Holy Grail in contract interpretation -- cannot be ascertained, courts apply “off the rack” rules to decide what they feel the proper result should be. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
" If the court finds there is no clear intent – which is often the case in dealing with a later developed technology -- the court may decide the matter based on social policy considerations.[1] That is, when the intent of the parties -- the Holy Grail in contract interpretation -- cannot be ascertained, courts apply “off the rack” rules to decide what they feel the proper result should be. [read post]
The Seventh Circuit adopted the Supreme Court’s “Safeco standard for scienter” arising out of the 2007 decision in Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am by Tobias Thienel
Occidental Exploration and Production Co. [2005] EWCA 1116, [2006] 2 WLR 70; the quotation is from Lord Wilberforce’s speech in Buttes Gas Oil Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
Pro-Football, Inc., 50 USPQ2d 1705 (TTAB 1999) [reversed on other grounds] ["Harjo I"] for determining whether matter may be disparaging under Section 2(a): what is the likely meaning of the matter in question, taking into account not only dictionary definitions, but also the relationship of the matter to the other elements in the mark, the nature of the goods or services, and the manner in which the mark is used in the marketplace in connection with the goods or services;if… [read post]