Search for: "Charles v. State"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 4,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2024, 7:51 am
Regulatory Rollback and Legal Challenges The Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Medinol Limited (EPLAW) EWHC (Pat): Costs order knocks spots off pimple patent: Select Healthcare v Cromptons (PatLit) EWPCC: ‘User’ basis available for assessment of trade mark damages: National Guild of Removers & Storers Ltd v Silveria (t/a C S Movers) (IP finance) Do it by the book: case management and questions for reference: Westwood v Knight; SAS Institute v World Programming (IPKat) EWCA finds Grimme’s agricultural machinery patent… [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:10 pm
This may significantly impact on privacy laws across all Europe’s contracting states. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:17 am
" It's by Charles P. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Charles, Aurora and Joliet, Ill. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Manago v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 11:44 pm
J. 48***Charles S. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
Hyder v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:48 am
” Examples featured on this blog include the decision by Justice Saliann Scarpulla (then a Manhattan Commercial Division judge, later elevated to the appellate bench) in Advanced 23, LLC v Chamber House Partners, LLC and retired Justice Charles Ramos’s decision in Goldstein v Pikus. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:37 am
An end of sorts finally arrived in June, when Manhattan’s Appellate Division – First Department issued Fuks v Rakia Assocs., 228 AD3d 501 [1st Dept 2024]. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am
The case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
The ICO released a statement in response, stating that it does not share the views of the report. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:16 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
It is not uncommon for the state apparatus itself to be impeached by the people as a core political act; but the state protects its own apparatus through an ideology of law that vests the legitimate power to impeach (like political power) only in itself. [read post]
Mississippi AG Hood calls Dickie Scruggs a 'confidential informant," says he shouldn't be prosecuted
29 Aug 2007, 1:00 am
(Still, all in all, Hazard's declaration was not as strong as the one written by Charles Wolfram, State Farm's expert). [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 11:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
Varsity Brands to patent review in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:29 am
United States, involving similar issues. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:58 pm
” State Farm v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am
The procedure in that case, Burnham v. [read post]
