Search for: "Does 1 - 47"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 4,452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
” While we recognize that the FLSA is to be narrowly construed in light of its remedial nature, that general principle does not mean that every word must be given a rigid, formalistic interpretation. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:20 am
And though the complaint does not detail how or whether information got to the very top of the bank -- to Jamie Dimon, for example, who is discussed extensively in Gillian Tett’s highly regarded “Fool’s Gold” -- it does show relevant processes reaching to a very high level in the bank. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
They choose from lists of 3 drawn by the governments of the 47 members in a manner which is totally opaque. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:46 am
Assange’s arguments are as follows: (1) Ms. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Union of India & Others AIR 1987 SC 1086, this Court observed that Article 32 does not merely confer power on this Court to issue direction, order or writ for the enforcement of fundamental rights. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 12:58 am
Set Up Tax Reporting 47. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:08 pm
In the 47-page opinion filed on Tuesday, U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:38 pm
R.S. 47:287.86(I)(1) is nearly identical to that employed under federal law. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:58 pm
I only register a bill once for each of the above categories, so (for example) a bill that creates 1 felony and 1 misdemeanor-A crime only counts once for each of those two categories, as does a bill that creates 3 felonies and 2 misdemeanor-A crimes.Regular readers know Texas already has 2,383 separate felonies on the books, including 11 involving oysters. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:29 am
Does 1-59, 2011 WL 292128 (S.D. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:14 am
The learned Judges said that a just but unreasoned conclusion does not appear to be just to those who read the same. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 7:48 am
Another 47 workplace fatalities were tied to traffic accidents, 9 deaths linked to fires or explosions, and 25 North Carolina workers died due to acts of violence or assault occurring while on-the-job. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
Beverly Hills, CA, US 90210 Telephone: +1 (310) 275-6664 Fax: +1 (310) 550-1856 aldenlaw@yahoo.com Dennis Moore, Attorney at Law 5041 La Mart Dr., Ste 230 Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 660-5289 Fax: (951) 340-3276 Mandelman out. ~~~ Filed 1/27/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CLAUDIA JACQUELINE ACEVES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
23 Fed Sentencing Rep 1 ()ct., 2010). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
Strasbourg does not strike down UK legislation, it simply monitors whether, in cases brought before it, the laws of any one of the 47 states signed up to the ECHR have infringed particular rights that all of those states have agreed to accept. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:31 am
FDA does not provide that information for the Agency’s Fiscal Year 2008 report, but according to the Fiscal Year 2009 report, “FDA responded to 23 petitions subject to section 505(q) within the 180-day statutory timeframe. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14] Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14] Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 6:59 am
Does anyone know? [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 9:37 am
Locke, Does anti-paparazzi mean anti-press? [read post]
