Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 3501 - 3520 of 30,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2021, 2:19 am by Chijioke Okorie
For example, it was suggested that for the quotation exception in section 12B(1)(a) of the CAB, the “fair practice” standard should be explicitly stated so that the quotation exception will only apply inter alia where the quotation “is compatible with fair practice”. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
The Barclay Brothers successfully argued that the dual role of the office of Seneschal, as President of the Chief of Pleas and chief judge, meant that the 2008 Law was incompatible with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”) (the right to a fair trial). [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:37 pm by John W. Arden
The fair use doctrine did not apply to the claims and did not warrant a dismissal because The Navajo Nation sufficiently stated trademark infringement claims, according to the court. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm by Florian Mueller
The calendar of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit still states that each side will get 10 minutes in the third criminal case; maybe another judge will fill in or they have some other solution.Presumably the three judges to whom the case was assigned--and their clerks--have already spent a fair amount of time analyzing the case, and hopefully they will remain in charge.For a civil law case, Epic Games v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 11:40 am
Yesterday was the 50th anniversary of the day in 1963 when the United State Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling of Brady v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 10:46 am by Steven Boutwell
   The removed actions included two separate matters filed in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana – Warren Lester, et. al. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
Although the prosecution abandoned the argument because of the state of the law at the time of trial, Justice Corrigan found that the issue should have been considered in fairness to the State. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release  which meant that the claimant,  Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]