Search for: "Foster v. US" Results 3501 - 3520 of 3,571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2007, 9:29 pm
  In In the Matter of 49 Wb, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:27 am
Here is the abstract:On the 40th anniversary of Loving v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Given the breakdown in the child's relationship with the father, testimony from the child's former therapist that he feared for the physical safety of both the child and the father, the child's repeated requests that she be permitted to reside with the mother, and the positive relationship between the child and the mother, there is a sound and substantial basis in the record for Family Court's decision ....Three guesses who was flipping out over that outcome.For a copy of the… [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:07 am
The question before us is, When does the running of the ten-year statute of limitations commence? [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property Issues Over Trademarks' Use Preclude Judgment On Gem Grading Laboratory's Contract Breach Claims Margel v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 2:35 pm
  ROR, or Release on Recognizance, is never used in juvenile systems. [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:55 am
Charney v Sullivan & Cromwell, Take 2 [Arthur Leonard / Leonard Link] I Received This Email, Moments After Posting About Charney's Amended Complaint [Lavi Soloway] [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:09 pm
The change began in the 1970s at both the state and federal level (think Jerry Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:54 am
  The seminal case on point is a U.S. decision, Bridgeman Art Library v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:09 pm
Part IV contends that the disclosure-focused reforms, which form the bulwark of these acts, will not foster ethical nonprofit board governance. [read post]
12 May 2007, 8:16 pm
Teleflex decision in an editorial Patent ruling good news for fostering innovation.The editorial began:American patent law should provide large incentives that reward innovation. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:25 pm
" Since he suffered from "deficient parenting skills" and had a "propensity for domestic violence," (with "aggressive and threatening behavior" remaining unabated), the AD1 concluded that it was in the child's best interests to allow the youngster to be adopted by his foster mother.For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Joquan… [read post]