Search for: "Frank v. State" Results 3501 - 3520 of 4,737
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2022, 12:23 am by Jan von Hein
Supreme Court has answered various questions regarding the applicability and scope of § 1782(a) in its Intel Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:37 am by Jennifer Davis
Frank, a former Justice Black clerk who wrote the Miranda Brief for the U S. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:16 am by John H. Simpson
The decision in Vinod Chopra Films Private Limited et al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:50 pm by Adam Levitin
Last week the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey issued an opinion in a case captioned Kemp v. [read post]
Chairman Frank, Ranking Member Bachus, and distinguished members of the Committee, thank you very much for inviting me to testify today. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am by Susan Brenner
[T]he need to protect a frank and candid jury deliberation process is a strong policy consideration. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
City of Chicago, 382 F.3d 680 (7th Cir. 2004); Frank v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Over 100 years ago, in Lord v Hull, 178 NY 9 [1904], the New York Court of Appeals — the state’s highest court — drew upon English common law to establish what has become a bedrock principle of American partnership law, that courts generally will not entertain lawsuits between partners except in the setting of a dissolution or final accounting. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm by Elina Saxena
Libyan officials suggested that French forces are fighting alongside Libyan troops as they battle against the Islamic State, while Reuters reports that “French special forces and intelligence commandos are engaged in covert operations against Islamic State militants in Libya in conjunction with the United States and Britain. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the… [read post]