Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 4,535
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 4:05 pm
QVT Fund LP v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:56 am
Malvasio v Savran; 2011 NY Slip Op 31763(U); June 30, 2011; Supreme Court, Nassau County Judge: Jeffrey S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 pm
(König v Germany) Given that the application for review can only be exercised by the individual offender, and it concerns whether or not that individual remains subject to notification requirements, it is in both substance and effect of a personal or, private, nature. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:57 am
Last month’s decision of the US Supreme Court in Brown v Entertainment Merchants’ Association (PDF) (formerly Schwarzenegger v VSDA) has attracted a lot of attention. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Scott was implanted with a ProDisc in Germany in 2006. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:18 am
However, in Reasons for Judgment released today (Neumann v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 6:18 am
Uruguay), and Germany v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
On this point the UK government had a pretty solid argument based on Behrami and Behrami v France and Saramati v France, Germany and Norway. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
By Otto Spijkers On the website of the Dutch Courts, you will find, in a few days, the English translation of the case in which the State of the Netherlands is held responsible for the death of three Muslim men after the fall of Srebrenica. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
The outbreak strain is consistent with the May-June outbreak strain in Germany. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
& Filmworks, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:43 am
LG; Colorquick v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 12:51 pm
NMT 4 (U.S.A. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am
Cautious Co v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:33 am
IPCom therefore commenced infringement proceedings against the Finnish company in Germany. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
It is well established that the courts are under a duty to construe domestic legislation which has been enacted to give effect to the UK’s obligations under the EU Treaty so as to give effect to those obligations (Pickstone v Freemans plc [1989] AC 66; Litster v Forth Dry Dock & Engineering Co Ltd [1990] 1 AC 546). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
On this day in ...... 2001 (10 years ago today), the International Court of Justice issued its judgment in LaGrand (Germany v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:18 pm
Air Force personnel in Germany (United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm
In contrast the players in Nokia v IPCom are real -- and here we are talking of corporate decision-makers, investors and shareholders -- and their interests are real too. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
Opus, a Germany based company, sells via Dutch web sites blank media to Dutch customers. [read post]
