Search for: "Greene v. Greene" Results 3501 - 3520 of 8,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2024, 9:57 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Trump forecasted in a podcast interview (as also reported and welcomed in the Indian press) that during his second term: “What I want to do and what I will do is, [that if] you graduate from a college, I think you should get a green card automatically as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The first of these was a green paper introduced in 1973 by Allan MacEachen, President of the Privy Council. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 3:58 am by Adams Lee
The post Biden Extends, Modifies Solar Tariffs – Climate Change v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:00 am by Scott Wolfe
Other Changes (Non-Numeric BMPs) The EPA has identified other mandatory Best Management Practices (BMPs) relating to: (i) Erosion and Sediment Controls (40 CFR § 450.21(a)); (ii) Soil Stabilization (40 CFR § 450.21(b)); (iii) Dewatering (40 CFR § 451.21(c)); (iv) Pollution Prevention Measures (40 CFR § 450.21(d)); and (v) Prohibited Discharges (40 CFR §450.21(e)). [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 3:28 am
"] April 15, 2021 - 1 PM: Garan Services Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court noted that Yonkers had submitted evidence demonstrating, prima facie, that "the police officer's vehicle had a green light, that Chesney was in the crosswalk near the middle of the road attempting to cross the street against the light, and the officer attempted to brake in order to avoid contact. [read post]
23 May 2020, 12:03 am by Magdaleen Jooste
In the case of Agarwal v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Although in Pumpelly v Green Bay Company (1872) the Court declared that an interference with the common use of property could be the equivalent of a taking, it subsequently retreated to the view that 5th Amendment was confined to appropriation of title or physical takings. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says these rules do not violate the First Amendment.The case is Vugo, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Tom Kosakowski
Facilitator: Akanmu Adebayo, Ombuds, Kennesaw State University Mediation v. ombuds. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 8:36 am
Green Shades Software, Inc., whereby the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm by karen
It is now the rule of democratic engagement, not the exception, ” said EFF Civil Liberties Director David Greene. [read post]