Search for: "Gunning v. Doe" Results 3501 - 3520 of 5,329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 5:49 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Supp. 472,476 (E.D.N.Y. 1982) (plot ofa live radio broadcast from a remote location being interrupted by a man with a gun - not protectable); Midwood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Igor De Lazari and Antonio G. Sepulveda
Thus, if the State does not adequately establish both probable cause and exigent circumstances, or another recognized exception to the warrant requirement, then evidence obtained as a result of the warrantless entry will be excluded from evidence (Gutierrez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am by Stephen Wermiel
Although the revision received relatively little notice after a high-profile Court decision, in 1996 Congress passed a new, amended Gun-Free Schools Zone Act after the Supreme Court had invalidated the original law the year before in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:56 am by Jon
The Fourth Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:01 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am by Michael C. Dorf
(4) Where does state sovereign immunity come from? [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm by Cristina Tilley
The question before the Court in Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:54 am by Eric Turkewitz
That issue was raised years ago here in New York’s high court in a gun case, Hamilton v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:15 pm by Rory Little
Unsurprisingly (see my post-argument analysis), that pattern held true in today’s decision in Manuel v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:47 am by Jeff Welty
Trexler, cited above, provides some support for that, as does State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:46 am by Stephen Wermiel
Scalia’s willingness to overturn gun laws in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:59 pm by Ilya Somin
  Today, Texas state trial Judge David Peeples issued a decision in Van Stean v. [read post]