Search for: "House v. House" Results 3501 - 3520 of 41,217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 10:36 am by Giles Peaker
R(Uddin) v Southwark LBC (2019) EQHC 180 (Admin) (Not on Bailii. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:11 pm by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
Supreme Court ruling in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm by Giles Peaker
Merritt v Thurrock Council & Anor (2021) EW Misc 2 (CC) A county court case of duelling injunction applications concerning Ms Merritt’s (re)occupation of what had been temporary accommodation arranged by Thurrock and managed by Midos Managment Co Ltd under section 188(3) Housing Act 1996. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:29 am
This past October, the large advertising agency Dentsu America and its CEO were named as defendants in a sex harassment and discrimination lawsuit, Biegel v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
But on April 28, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer announced that the House would not be reconvening as planned. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:23 am by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
The Mortgage Bankers Association and Housing Policy Council (the “Associations”) recently filed an Amici Curiae brief supporting the position of Townstone Financial regarding the scope of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) in the case CFPB v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
Adam Mossoff reveals that the O’Reilly v. [read post]