Search for: "IN RE M W" Results 3501 - 3520 of 4,242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2015, 5:42 am
Horses eat on holidays, so you're on properties and work 24/7 in the horse business. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:45 am by Jim Baker
Finally, by quoting Jesus on this subject, I’m not saying that Donald Trump or his supporters are my enemies. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 12:04 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  Some have genuinely changed on almost all issues and seem now to be liberals (such as, say, Nicolle Wallace on MSNBC, who worked in the George W. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 2:05 pm by Susan Landau
Earlier this September, law enforcement officials from the Five Eyes intelligence alliance—made up of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States—met in Australia and issued a Statement of Principles on Access to Evidence and Encryption. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(I:342–44) In fact, Wilson’s deeply anti-Semitic outside adviser Colonel Edward M. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 12:43 pm by Berin Szóka, Ari Cohn
Conservatives may claim that’s akin to social media services saying they’re politically neutral when pressed by lawmakers at hearings, but the analogy doesn’t work. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:37 am by Joel R. Brandes
Leslie alleged that the children will suffer from “[w]itnessing a pattern of violence between” her and Mr. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Integrity right misundersands relationship b/t author, text and public in way that casts disruptive dialogic engagement as moral and legal wrong; not consistent w/feminist politics of confrontation, resistance, and social reform. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Court says: Regennex is a drug and a biological product w/in the meaning of the FDCA. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 12:48 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  I go out of my way never to use the acronym "GOP" to refer to the Republican Party, and I have never (as far as I recall) put the word President in front of the names Donald Trump or George W. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 11:00 am by Chimène Keitner
They want to know if you’re with Trump or not. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
 But as Judge Callahan points out, "[w]hile the Court found that heightened judicial scrutiny of the law was required, the Court did not actually apply heightened scrutiny. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]