Search for: "In Interest of Jones" Results 3501 - 3520 of 7,325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm by William Baude
Jones, in which the Supreme Court allowed California to exercise jurisdiction over a pair of Floridians who wrote an allegedly defamatory news story about a California resident. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:51 pm by Orin Kerr
Professor Little asked if I would be interested in posting it, and I am happy to do so. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:51 am by James R. Marsh
We hope this sends a powerful message to people interested in child pornography. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:09 am by David S. Kemp
Jones to support its argument that the evidence obtained from the GPS-tracked van should be excluded. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am by John Day
Jones, 164 S.W.2d 823 (Tenn. 1942) the law required the filing of a sworn, detailed statement of campaign expenses not more than ten but no less than five days before an election. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 7:27 am by David Fraser
This can and should be contrasted to the Jones v Tsige case from the Ontario Court of Appeal. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:02 am by Gritsforbreakfast
I may often disagree with him, but Bradley's a smart guy and last week he posed an interesting question that merits Grits readers attention:When SCOTUS decided the Jones case and said placing a GPS device on a car was a search, the Court did not decide whether a warrant was required. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:41 am by Roy Black
Jones) or third party business records (US v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
LOGICWEB ED Pennsylvania 2013http://t.co/dc7nZB9Foc -> Bennett Jones, McCarthy Tetrault make Top 100 Employers list http://t.co/f4lHtDb3sk -> Justice opens up to social media http://t.co/JX3VnOifM8 -> Yahoo sours on its search partnership with Microsoft http://t.co/WRVQTZsthO -> European Parliament Votes to Permit Pseudonymous Data Profiling http://t.co/qhHxdbHg95 -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-10-21: Legislative Summary Published for C-56, An Act to amend the… [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/PZninMX1D5 -> National Photo Group Brings Copyright Suit to Protect Interests in Photos http://t.co/lt2wscvHKd -> EU: Right to be forgotten now the right to erasure | Privacy This Week http://t.co/JNJ56fjQnY -> Cyber criminals cost India $4 billion in 2013: Symantec http://t.co/mQqQBIQtQi -> Bill C-56 in Parliament http://t.co/ph7EEFS082 -> Pirate Bay cofounder appeals hacking case, argues to halt his extradition http://t.co/N6gpOAa9Fl -> [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:30 am by Orin Kerr
I think the most difficult and most interesting argument is the automobile exception. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
If they had, "Normally that would cause a problem, but since the bonds are in default, bondholders have not been receiving any tax-exempt interest that the IRS could declare taxable." [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
[this verbal formulation may be subject to correction]Licensing 61.8% Revision of the Copyright Directive 38.2% There then followed a discussion between Lord Clement-Jones and Arlene McCarthy MEP about trends and sentiments in the EU and, in particular, in the European Parliament itself. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:41 am by Jane Chong
 The “mosaic theory,” as Fourth Amendment scholar Orin Kerr has dubbed it, has attracted a good deal of attention from scholars interested in the implications of the ever-decreasing costs of perpetual surveillance. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 10:25 pm by Orin Kerr
The Court also ruled that there was no trespass under Jones, as “the mere transmission of electric signals” to identify the car is not a trespass. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937) (federal regulatory power extended to intra state activities that could cumulatively have a substantial effect on commerce);  Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:13 am by Walter Olson
The dissent by Judge Edith Jones, p. 46 at footnote 3, cites my “Sentence First, Verdict Afterward,” from the July issue of Commentary magazine, on the federal government’s unhealthy interest lately in developing legal doctrines that pressure private institutions into adopting speech codes aimed at protecting listeners’ sensitivities. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:58 am by Fernando A. Bohorquez, Jr.
For those interested in a more detailed summary of the law, you should be sure to check out this author’s recent article examining the DMCA and the latest legal developments. [read post]