Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 3501 - 3520
of 12,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
For starters, precluding a party from re-litigating an issue may be justified only if that party had adequate incentive and opportunity to fully contest the issue in the original litigation. [read post]
5 May 2022, 2:53 pm
A great deal can, and often does, happen during that process, which can be protracted and intense; coalitions form and re-form, majorities appear and dissolve, opinions are narrowed or broadened, etc. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
The Judicial Disciplinary Opinions page, where the opinion re Judge Hanley is found, provides:When the Qualifications Commission files formal charges against a judge, judicial officer, or judicial candidate, only the Supreme Court may resolve the case, either after the Commission and the judge enter into a settlement agreement or after a panel of Masters preside over an evidentiary hearing and report to the Court.The list includes nearly 40 reprimands, going back to 1986. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 12:10 am
Finally yesterday, in the third day of Judiciary Committee hearings on the confirmation of Judge Sonia Sotomayor as Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, one Senator asked her a question about her decisions on religious freedom. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
But, as lawyers, we're not out for cuteness. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:31 am
Being on parole did not disqualify the men from full compensation, the opinion by Justice David Medina said. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
The rationale for the doctrine is efficiency: Why expend time and resources re-litigating an issue that was fully and fairly determined in a prior case? [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 1:15 am
Moses PelhamLast year The IPKat reported that the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) had referred the longstanding Metall auf Metall litigation to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:43 am
I’ll tell you, here’s what we’re going to do. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 7:17 am
Judge Victor Marrero ruled that the provisions violated the First Amendment and the separation of powers guaranteed by the Constitution; they’re “the legislative equivalent of breaking and entering, with an ominous free pass to the hijacking of constitutional values,” Marrero wrote in this 103-page opinion. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:41 pm
HB 140 was approved by the Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee by an 8-5 vote and will now go to the House floor. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 10:59 am
What's your opinion? [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:54 am
I am disappointed that The News published, as a news article, the opinions of John V. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:15 am
Back then, it didn’t take long for Court watchers and average Americans to forget that she was “the Lady Justice,” and to focus instead on her opinions. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
In re Simon Shiao Tam, 808 F.3d 1321 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
In re Simon Shiao Tam, 808 F.3d 1321 (Fed. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 2:20 pm
It's not like they're making snap evidentiary rulings from a trial bench or anything. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
The cumulative effect of individual freedom and its exercise is transformed into the power of digital mass opinion and its conditioning shadow. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 12:23 pm
well clearly you're violating the copyright act. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 3:35 am
Wednesday saw the US Supreme Court hand down the 9th and 10th opinions of the term. [read post]
