Search for: "In The Matter Of: Jones" Results 3501 - 3520 of 6,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 11:54 pm by Stan
Moreover, to simplify matters, I’ll refer to all this activity as FDI, even though many forms of outsourcing do not involve any equity stakeholding whatsoever. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:42 pm by P.J. Blount
Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012) 2 Katz, 389 U.S. at 360, 88 S.Ct. at 516 3 476 U.S. 207, 106 S.Ct. 1809 (1986) 4 476 U.S. at 214, 106 S.Ct. at 181 [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 am by David Urban
  (The Supreme Court in fact rejected a rule of personal liability for retaliation in Jones v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:42 am by conn
"Said Jones, “I think how fragile their religion must be to think that they have to have government to prop up their religion. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Florida Drug Statute Constitutional - Breaking News Update July 12, 2012 - The Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion today in State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am by Meir Feder
Royal Dutch Petroleum symposium comes from Meir Feder, a partner at Jones Day, where he heads the Issues and Appeals Practice in the firm’s New York office. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 10:00 pm
 Jurisdiction IssuesUnder the United States Constitution, the federal judiciary is given original jurisdiction in matters arising at sea. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm by Steve
EQT Production Company, Judge Jones overruled objections to Magistrate Judge Sargent's ruling, but modified it, where the subject matter was EQT's obligation to produce 370 GB of e-mails. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 11:12 am by Eric
Those statements concern a matter of public interest [for anti-SLAPP purposes]. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 2:00 am by Clara Altman
Jones, Hunting in the Shadows: The Pursuit of Al Qa’ida Since 9/11 (Norton & Company).The New York Times also has reviews of David B. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:57 am by Brian Shiffrin
It is well settled that a post-trial motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 cannot preserve a contention for review that is raised for the first time in the motion (see People v McFadden, 94 AD3d 1150, 1150; People v Jones, 85 AD3d 1667, 1668), but as noted that is not what occurred here inasmuch as defendant made an objection before jury selection. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:50 am by Mandelman
  She’s been interviewed by all sorts of people, including Max Kaiser a couple of weeks ago, and Alex Jones… but lots of others as well. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:50 am by Mandelman
  She’s been interviewed by all sorts of people, including Max Kaiser a couple of weeks ago, and Alex Jones… but lots of others as well. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:51 pm
The court recommended that the matter be remanded for further proceedings and noted that since sentencing had not yet taken place, Ms. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937) The “activity” test will almost always be relevant only to the third type of use of the Commerce Clause. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:12 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court precedent is flatly contrary, see Jones v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:08 am by Kali Borkoski
(The second issue before the Court was whether the first question is one of subject matter jurisdiction.) [read post]