Search for: "LEAD CLASS PLAINTIFFS" Results 3501 - 3520 of 6,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Opinions in concession-driven cases are of limited value and can lead to confusion in the lower courts. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 3:03 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
§ 1292(b) its prior Order dismissing the plaintiffsclass claims relating to Region 43 of the company (encompassing Tennessee and other states) as time-barred. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
§ 1292(b) its prior Order dismissing the plaintiffsclass claims relating to Region 43 of the company (encompassing Tennessee and other states) as time-barred. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
§ 1292(b) its prior Order dismissing the plaintiffsclass claims relating to Region 43 of the company (encompassing Tennessee and other states) as time-barred. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:23 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
While other courts may not follow Judge Pauley’s lead, Glatt is sure to serve as a roadmap for plaintiffs’ counsel who are looking to capitalize on the recent growth (if anecdotal reports are to be believed) of internships in private-sector workplaces as a consequence of the sluggish job market. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
Obama, filed in the District of the District of Columbia; the lead plaintiffs are Larry Klayman, the head of judicial watch, and Charles and Mary Ann Strange, the parents of a Navy SEAL killed in Afghanistan, on behalf of all other Verizon customers. [read post]
My article, “Private Policing of Mergers and Acquisitions: An Empirical Assessment of Institutional Lead Plaintiffs in Transactional Class and Derivative Actions,” fills the gap, offering new insights into the utility of mergers and acquisitions litigation. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:14 am by Suzanne Schreck
  The lawsuit was filed by Seattle-based Marler Clark, the nation’s leading law firm representing victims of foodborne illness, on behalf of named plaintiffs Jenabe and Motoko Caldwell and all other Hawaii residents who received hepatitis A vaccination or immune globulin injections to prevent hepatitis A infection after eating the Townsend Farms frozen berry blend. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:18 am by Bill Marler
  The lawsuit was filed by Seattle-based Marler Clark, the nation’s leading law firm representing victims of foodborne illness, on behalf of named plaintiffs Jay Seward and all other Washington state residents who received hepatitis A vaccination or immune globulin injections to prevent hepatitis A infection after eating the Townsend Farms frozen berry blend or who required testing for hepatitis A after consuming the Townsend Farms product. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:07 am by Glenn
On the pure antitrust merits, however, whether to pay off these class action plaintiffs is a decision Apple really should not have to make. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court (Morgan Tire & Auto, LLC), ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jun. 4, 2013), the Court of Appeal (Sixth Appellate District) followed the lead of the other Brown case, and held that a "no-class-or-representative-action" arbitration clause could not defeat the plaintiffs' statutory right to bring a representative PAGA claim and seek penalties on behalf of the state. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:55 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, saying that Rule 68 was not designed to allow defendants to "pick-off" lead plaintiffs. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:54 am by Bart Torvik
The redacted nature of the opinion-making also leads to this:A Parting Shot. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:36 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
The plaintiffs signed a standard dispute-resolution contract, which provided for arbitration of disputes and prohibited arbitration “‘on a class basis or as a collective action or representative action. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Yang brings considerable experience to her office, having been a partner in the civil rights and employment litigation department of Cohen Milstein, a leading plaintiffsclass action law firm. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 1:29 pm by Karen M. Morgan
 In their letter, the industry groups express concern that the CFPB’s QM rule appears “incompatible” with disparate impact liability because it will tighten credit standards through facially neutral requirements that could lead to disparate impacts on protected classes of borrowers. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:24 pm by Bill Marler
 According to the class action complaint filed in Orange County Superior Court, Jacob Petersen and all other potential class action plaintiffs in this lawsuit are those persons who were required, for public health and personal safety reasons, to obtain a vaccination against hepatitis A, or who received a prophylactic dose of immune globulin (IG), due to their exposure. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:59 am by Greg Mersol
  The district court refused to certify the class, citing differences among hiring managers at different locations, as well as conflicts among the then plaintiff representatives and the proposed classes. [read post]
29 May 2013, 12:46 pm by Susanne Klaric
May 23, 2013), the court of appeals revived a purported class action lawsuit against Omnicare. [read post]